With the ever growing need for utilities to communicate with devices in the field, legacy networks are being replaced and upgraded to handle the challenge. Utilities need to extend their field area networks (FAN) further and further to enable Distribution Automation (DA), Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), Substation Automation and Distributed Generation. These networks offer a secure and flexible method to provide manageable communications. Readiness for this transition from the older field area networks is complex and having the right plan in place before deployment can make all the difference.
Utilities typically implement a multi-tiered communications network architecture where:
This article will investigate four specifics to Tier 2 – the field area network and migration from legacy to new systems.
The kickoff meeting…the best opportunity to energize the team and establish a common purpose toward milestones and deliverables. How does one effectively approach this with a balance of inclusiveness and command? Having an agenda is a good start, but more importantly is the execution of that agenda at meeting time. Define the purpose, the expected goals and deliverables of the project and walk the team through the high-level plan. This isn’t the time to go into every detail, but to step through the plan and point out potential bottlenecks.
Having a well thought out and agreed upon RACI matrix (responsible, accountable, consulted, informed) describes the participation by various roles in completing tasks or deliverables for the project. In utilities, field area network replacements typically cut across many organizations, for example, telecom, SCADA, operations, field deployment, and DA engineering. Having a clear understanding of everyone’s roles will allow situations to be resolved in an efficient manner.
The likely location of the head ends for the replacement FAN will be where the legacy head end locations are today; however, take this opportunity to evaluate the wireless technology and understand the networks’ current and future density, wireless propagation characteristics, etc. to evaluate the best head end locations moving forward. Some considerations:
Whether utilizing a mesh or point-to-multipoint architecture the field area network may use a number of wireless repeaters. From a deployment perspective there are a number of considerations:
While sometimes an afterthought, inventory management can make or break a significant field area network replacement project. Month after month thousands of pieces of radio equipment and accessories will be coming in from the equipment vendor and going out to the field for installation. Understanding when and where that equipment is placed in the field will keep the project moving along, but also assist the network operation team when the inevitable troubleshooting starts. Some considerations:
As the project progresses, the deployed parts of the network will be transitioned to a run state and the operations team will take over for day-to-day issues. Best practice should be for the deployment team to incorporate operational processes in their efforts. In doing this, operational process will have been tested “over and over” so that the baton passing from deployment to operation is seamless. Additionally, whether the field area network is being deployed all at once or broken up into “areas,” having a common checklist of close-out information per area will ensure that all requirements are met and there are no exceptions that operations should be aware of. Some considerations:
At West Monroe, we have the business and technology acumen to assist your utility in getting started with this. We helped a large, multiservice investor-owned utility navigate the evaluation process—and ultimately take a key step toward replacing its current FAN communication infrastructure with next-generation functionality and capabilities.
I am even more accessible than the other modals.